Raise Your Marketing IQRaise Your Marketing IQ

What Compete does for website analytics uberVU is now trying to do for social media. The company has just launched Compare, a new tool that does instant side-by-side social media performance comparisons by keyword or brand name.

Compare offers a freemium social media head-to-head comparison tool where users can input two brand names, keywords or phrases and view charts and graphs on how the entities rank against each other in terms of daily social media mentions, percent share of conversations for a particular site, and various sentiment breakdowns. Premium users can also export the associated data.

It’s a simplistic service on first look, especially for non-pro users, but for quick comparisons on products, movies and businesses, Compare overs a convenient glance at the bigger social media picture, especially as it evolves over time.

For instance, looking at Avatar against Inglorious Basterds (see screenshot below), you can begin to see the story of how the movies are individually tracking in terms of social media mentions, and how they compare side by side.

Given that the tool is simple to use, easy on the eyes, and can be applied to almost any purpose, we can see it becoming an incredibly useful utility (especially to the entertainment industry). uberVU Pro plans start at $29.99 p/month, making the service a reasonably priced alternative to other social media monitoring services on the market.

[img credit: rezachka, iStockphoto]

Tags: MARKETING, social media monitoring, ubervu

Want all your downloads, streaming video, and other techie media stuff on your TV? Wondering which media center works best for you? Here’s a look at the biggies in chart and Venn diagram form, followed by some lengthy breakdowns of each.

New to the idea of TV-connected computers? Head down below the charts for some explainers and deeper comparisons of each system. If you’re already familiar with the HTPC scene, we’ll give you the good stuff first.

We focused on three widely available, and generally popular, media centers for our comparison and review. We’re certainly aware there are many alternatives out there, as free software or stand-alone hardware boxes, but these are the three media centers that receive ongoing development, and can be installed on the widest number of TV-connected computers.

The graphical explanations

Here’s how we see the three major media centers, in chart list and Venn diagram forms:

What’s a media center, exactly?

What does a media center do? It varies, but it generally takes all the stuff you’d normally enjoy on a computer or portable device—MP3s, video files, Netflix, Hulu, digital photos, and web/social apps—and plays it on a television, through your spearkers, and back onto your wireless network, if you’d like. Media centers can be run off of pretty much any capable computer, but are generally intended for small and specialized computers, called Home Theater PCs, or HTPCs. HTPCs have the video and audio ports necessary to hook up to a modern high-definition television, and generally have enough processing power and memory to handle the heavy burden of converting, playing, and sometimes recording high-resolution files. If you’ve got a home network set up with shared files and network-attached storage (NAS), media centers can generally pull their content off other systems and devices, as well as receive files for storage and download them directly off the net.

Put simply, a media center allows you to sit on a couch and do the most fun things you’d do on a computer with a remote. You can fire up a movie from Netflix’s streaming service or from a file you’ve already downloaded, catch the show you missed last night on Hulu, put on background music while you’re doing something else, share your Flickr or Picasa photos with visiting relatives—whatever you’d like, really.

Not every media center can do everything, however, and some are much better at certain entertainment jobs than others. The editors at Lifehacker conferred on what each box does best, tried to pin down what each system can and can’t do, and put it together in ways that we hope can help you decide.

Windows Media Center, XBMC, and Boxee

Here’s a more in-depth look at the media centers—installing and setting them up, and their pros and cons.

Windows Media Center is “free” with Home Premium or Ultimate copies of Windows Vista, all versions of Windows 7 except Starter or Home Basic, and available as a stand-alone, XP-based operating system dubbed “Media Center Edition.” XBMC is a free and open-source media center software that was born as a game-changing XBOX modification, but now runs on Windows, Mac, Linux, and XBOX systems, as well as booting and running off a USB stick. Boxee is based on the same core internal code as XBMC, but focuses on bringing web content—video sites, blog streams, and social apps—into your living room, while XBMC remains oriented toward a download-and-play setup.

Plex, a popular and very eye-pleasing media center for Mac OS X, is certainly a contender in this category. For all intents and purposes, though, it’s a variant of XBMC. Most anything we write or display in this post about XBMC applies to Plex, too, except for matters of looks and interface.

Those would be our definitions in the Lifehacker Dictionary, anyways. Let’s get a bit more encyclopedic on the strengths and weaknesses of each system:

Windows Media Center

Installation and Setup: Fairly easy. It comes pre-loaded in the higher-end editions of Windows Vista and 7, and assuming your computer or HTPC has the right outputs and plugs, Windows can fairly easily adjust its display to your television. If you’re running other Windows systems on your wireless network, you won’t have to do much configuration to start “sharing” files back and forth from the TV-connected system to your other platforms. If you’re running Mac or Linux computers, you’ll have a good deal more work to do. If your media computer came with a TV tuner card already installed, Windows will recognize it and work with it to record TV shows.

Here’s how Adam turned a Windows PC into a Media Center powerhouse, with a good detail on the installation and setup process.

Strengths

• Nice and easy DVR: And you don’t have to pay a monthly fee.
• Calm, easy interface:Divided into obvious sections and fairly intuitive directional layouts.
• Large range of compatible remotes: Look online or in an electronics store for a “Windows Media Center remote,” and you’ll find something with lots of buttons that instantly hooks up to your Media Center, usually through a USB-connected receiver.
• Generally easy networking: Across Windows systems, that is, and if you’re down with the shared folders setup.

Weaknesses

• File handling: Generally, Media Center can handle the same files that Windows Media Player can handle, and, with the right codec installations, that can be quite extensive. But out of the box, don’t expect support for the diverse range of video and audio you’ll find around the web.
• Windows-only: But you knew that.
• Complex remotes: Media Center works with a lot of remotes, but they often look like parodies of button-stuffed clickers. If a simple, Apple-like navigator exists for Media Center, do tell us in the comments.
• Locked-down DVR files: Work-arounds and decoders exist, of course, but if you want to play your recorded TV shows on anything other than your personal set of authorized Windows machines, Zunes, and XBOX devices, good luck.

XBMC

Installation and Setup: It depends, of course, on the platform and hardware you’re installing on. Getting it running and connected on a modern Windows or Mac system is fairly painless, at least from a software standpoint. Running it as a “live” system from a USB stick isn’t too hard, either, and you can install it from there onto an HTPC hard drive. Plugging it into a Madriva Linux box and hooking it up to your very specialized 1080p plasma setup with optical audio out will likely require hair plugs and years of therapy.

Read up on Adam’s guide to building a silent, standalone XBMC media center on the cheap for a look at the live-USB-to-installation path on a $200 HTPC system.

Strengths

• Open source, open nature: Need XBMC to do something it doesn’t do already? Chances are, there’s a clever hacker working on it. XBMC doesn’t have the same kind of “platform” that its offspring Boxee does, but coders can get into it and make it better, and make it do more.
• Meta-data and file recognition: From personal trials and commenter anecdotes, XBMC is really good at knowing when you’ve put new files somewhere in your system, figuring out what types of files they are (movie, TV, music, or picture), and reaching out to the internet to pull down relevant pictures, data, reviews, and even trailer links for the videos and music you plug into it.
• Light and agile: Relatively speaking, XBMC may have some really nice graphics and menus, but because it comes from a project to put a full media center on a game system, XBMC is focused on playing back media files as smoothly as possible.
• Slick, customizable looks: Even putting Plex aside, XBMC wins, hands-down, for looking like you’re living in the future when displayed on a really big, nice TV. Don’t like the way it looks by default? Put a new skin on it, and it’s a whole different beast.
• Format support: Personally, I’ve never found a file on the web, or converted from a friend’s computer, that XBMC couldn’t play, unless something was wrong with it.

Weaknesses:

• Lack of Netflix, Hulu: There have been work-arounds, hacks, and other tweaks to make XBMC work with the two big names in streaming video. If you were depending on either one, though, XBMC would not be a safe bet.
• Over-stuffed, sometimes complicated menus: XBMC’s menus and layout are the geekiest around—how you react to that depends on your temperament. You can do all kinds of things from any screen in XBMC, and its interface often has a smile-inducing futuristic feel to it. But for someone new to media centers and looking to just sit down and play something, it can be quite imposing.

Boxee

Installation and Setup: On Windows and Mac systems, the latest Boxee beta is relatively simple to install, as it uses the built-in video and audio systems to push out content. On Linux, it’s a good deal more complex, but, then again, what on Linux isn’t? Apple TVs require a bit of hacking. In general, Boxee is compatible with the same kind of hardware as XBMC—OpenGL or DirectX-compatible video cards are highly recommended.

Here’s how Kevin set up a cheap but powerful Boxee media center using a brawny $350 HTPC and free copies of Linux and Boxee.

Strengths

• Built-in Hulu and Netflix: Boxee and Hulu have had their differences, but they seem to have reached a draw in the stand-off—most Hulu shows and movies work, most of the time. Netflix works fine on Windows and Mac, assuming you don’t mind installing Microsoft’s Silverlight system.
• Growing directory of web content apps: Love FailBlog? Dig Vimeo’s really hi-res stuff? Fan of TwiT’s videocasts? Watch them all from Boxee’s app, and grab more in the app “store,” which has a very healthy selection of customized streaming content.
• Play anything (technically): Boxee uses a reworked Firefox browser to view Hulu, but it’s available for nearly any kind of web video page you find on the web. The Boxee Browser is a kind of last resort for any web content that doesn’t have its own app.

Weaknesses

• Love-it-or-leave-it interface: Even with its content-forward redesign, many media center aficianados have said they can’t get used to Boxee’s hidden left-hand sidebars and forward/back functionality. Some just don’t like the default looks. It’s not a make-or-break issue, considering it’s basically the same core tools as XBMC, but if you’re going to spend serious time with a media center, you want to like how it looks.
• Local file handling: Boxee doesn’t seem as smart about recognizing and updating local file stores. In the words of one Lifehacker editor, “Local files are almost an afterthought.” That’s to be expected, somewhat, on a system that’s so web-facing and stream-savvy, but Boxee could do a lot more to make download music, movies, and pictures easier to gather, organize, and access.

---

We know—we absolutely know—that we may have missed a feature, put in “No” where “Yes” should have been, or otherwise missed a detail or two in our breakdown of these media centers. We tried our best to research and check them, but if you see something wrong, or missing, in our explanations or charts, by all means: tell us, politely, in the comments, and we’ll update this post, and the charts to match the reality.

Feel free to also tell us which system has worked best for you, and why, in the comments.

Hotel review site Oyster.com won our admiration with their revealing, if limited, photo fakeouts series. Also worth checking out before you book? Their blog’s “Bundle Breakdowns” section, which similarly shines a light on package deals that aren’t actually deals.

Like the Photo Fakeout series, “Bundle Breakdowns” is helpful, occasionally funny, and revealing about the types of things that are covered up by the travel and leisure industry when they’re pressing a hard sell. But it’s also in need of its own organized, search-able spot, so travelers could find the particular deal, or travel vendor, they’re looking at and check to see if it’s made the list of fake bundle savings.

Then again, some of the deals actually turn out to be decent. But not all of them:

So there you have it: Somehow, the Sheraton’s free roundtrip flight deal ($1834.40) is $245.36 more expensive than using a booking engine (like Orbitz) to pay for both flights yourselves. Pretty fishy, eh?

If nothing else, a quick read through Bundle Breakdowns will encourage you to price out the components of any travel “value” you find, just to make sure you’re not getting the run-around.

Google used to offer up an automatic definition from sources like Dictionary.com or Answers.com. Now there’s a little blue “definition” link on the right side of any word or phrase search, offering Google’s own homebrew definition answers.

You’ll still see answers from Answers.com and other sources high up in the search results, of course, but Google’s own definition link lays out a word’s definition in traditional dictionary style, with usages, phonetic breakdowns, and multiple snippets from other web definitions. There’s also a link for “Starred words,” but I couldn’t find a way to actually star the word you’re currently looking at.

Is Google your good-enough dictionary these days, or do you find yourself liking the service of sites like Dictionary.com?

As a rule, extended warranties are rarely worth the extra cash. Tech site CNET goes in depth on why you don’t want to shell out for the extended warranty, then discusses when it may actually be worth it.

Photo by andrew_cosand.

On the “just forget it” side of things, CNET had this to say:

[T]he majority of gadgets won’t ever need to be repaired—though retailers and device makers don’t usually share statistics about how often they break, Consumer Reports has done studies and found that 3- to 4-year-old gadgets don’t need repair all that often. Laptops need service about 43 percent of the time after 3 or 4 years, desktops 31 percent, while camcorders and digital cameras very rarely, about 13 percent and 10 percent of the time, respectively. Three to four years is also a really long time when it comes to technology now. And as the cost of laptops and desktops, for example, continue to decline, sometimes the cost of replacing the device isn’t that much more than getting it repaired.

Even with big-ticket purchases, like your new flat panel HDTV, the post recommends skipping the price of an extended warranty, arguing that these are now tried-and-tested technologies where breakdowns are actually pretty rare.

So when should you actually buy an extended warranty? If you worry a lot and don’t feel like you can get peace of mind without it, grab the extended warranty. Likewise, if you absolutely cannot go an extra minute without the gadget in question should it break down, it may be worth it. (Though you may also want to consider making an extended warranty fund.)

Hit up the full post for all the details in the should-I-or-shouldn’t-I decision-making process (it’s a pretty good read), then let us know whether or not you take the extended warranty train or stick to the standard warranty bus in the comments. (This editor never goes for the extended warranty.)

Microsoft today informed investors about the financial impact of some organizational changes it has been making, and it posted an accompanying PowerPoint presentation titled “Segment Reporting Changes” for the financial year 2009, which ended back on June 30. The PowerPoint slide above shows a summary for the whole 2009 financial year, but the breakdowns per quarter are also included. In case tables are not your thing, here are the important bits:

It’s not a clever hack any of us want to have to use, but the Art of Manliness blog has a homebrew fix for the next time your restroom trip ends in disaster.

Photo by powerbooktrance.

When a toilet clogs, the first jobs are stopping water from flowing to prevent an overflow and finding a decent plunger. Then again, if you’re visiting a friend’s place and might feel embarrassed returning from the bathroom with such a request, some hot water from a bathroom sink might do the trick. Need more firepower? Add in dishwasher detergent to put things right:

Add a few cups of hot water to the toilet bowl before you start plunging. After you pour the hot water in, let it sit for a few minutes. To put it mildly, the heat helps break the, um, stuff up. This will make unclogging the toilet with the plunger much, much easier. The heat from the hot water can sometimes break up the clog without plunging, so this could be a good tactic to use if you a clog a toilet at a friends house and you don’t want to face the embarrassment of asking for a plunger.

The blog post, sourced from a Roto-Rooter representative, offers more good-to-know tidbits about properly using a (warmed and un-stiffened) plunger and using tools like an auger for the really bad, um, breakdowns. If you’d care to be so discrete as to share your own toilet emergency fixes, we’ll welcome them in the comments.